Four quadrants: Innovation X stable Operations, value - complexity
Clockwise, CounterClockwise
A cyle goes around.
A windwill goes counterclockwise. For convenience the proces life cycle is clockwise. There are conflicting expectations in communications.
🔰 the most logical
begin anchor.
Contents
| Reference | Topic | Squad |
| Intro | Clockwise, CounterClockwise | 01.01 |
| innxstbl | Conflict of interests, Innovation X Stable operations | 02.01 |
| | Issues to solve at Analtics life cycle | 02.02 |
| add-aim | Placing organsiational lines into innovation X operations | 03.01 |
| add-emoi | Adding emotions into quadrant | 04.01 |
| wall-cnfs | Communication: request - delivery 🚧 Expectations | 05.01 |
| | Communication: request - delivery 🚧 Disruptions | 05.02 |
| post_vln | Evaluating, What others post | 06.01 |
Progress
- 2020 week:28
- Adjusting into new stylesheet.
- 2019 week:16
- Started fresh, collecting pictures made long time before.
- Explanation only be able to do as last after the DLC page.
- 2019 week:16
- Missing are pictures for handling communications, making them animated.
Conflict of interests, Innovation X Stable operations
The dilemma is what is hanving the priority.
Starting with an innovation and than making that robust and stable or
Making the running processes stable and than innovate.
That question is of getting anserwers to business value and complexity - simplicity.
A startup doesn´t need to get answer on that.
labeling the quadrant:
- Doing things as used to be (push)
rigid but: predictable repeatable reliable.
- Ideal combination of new innovations and being trustworthy.
- Adhoc, nothing as should be operational or legal
but maybe having the necesssary new opportunities.
- Innovation, changing the business by doing things different. (pull)
Obvious is "doing things different" is conflicting with "doing things as usual".
Issues solving coöperation innovation X operation
The challlenge to solve the conflict is an mission impossible. The issues are well known for a very long time.
New technologies like moving into the cloud -AAS delivering by external parties will not solve it.
SukumarNayak (2015)
did publice a nice presentation on all kind of organizational issues. Showing a figure:
He refers to
what-is-devops.
Don´t expect the misalignment will be solved by placing the people for the different roles in a room. With cloud approaches you are placing people outside the organization.
Business-IT alignment is a process in which a business organization uses information technology (IT) to achieve business objectives -
typically improved financial performance or marketplace competitiveness.
Some definitions focus more on outcomes (the ability of IT to produce business value) than means (the harmony between IT and business decision-makers within the organizations). (wikipedia)
Placing organsiational lines into innovation X operations
Just a hierachical pyramid like many others. Strategy being on the top, Tactics in the middle, Development & Operations at the bottom.
The data symbol in the middle is ised in another page. It has no meaning, no place, at this paragraph.
The business service request is at the right side (developping, changing business), the service delivery at the left (operations, supply chain). The circle is following this logical order.
The figure:
When turning the pyramid 45 degrees clockwise it will fit into the "Innovations X Stable operations" quadrant.
The departments for the best fit location according the quadrant descriptions.
The figure transforms into:
In the middle of the quadrant there is the "wall of confusion".
Adding emotions into the inno quadrant
Working in organizations is managing humans and managing technology.
Normal thinking: top-down human management, a pyramid. (left)
Effective technical staff supports as many as possible,a reversed pyramid. (right)
The dependencies on the top or the bottom are both single point of failures.
The business ICT proces is involving many types of specialists:
- Database administrators, database usage promotors
Being strict how others should execute, like military lead drillng followers.
- ICT staff operational
sometime open for change, most happy in the own drilled solutions
- proces managers
Intermediates for the business. Wishing a well organized wealthy environment.
- Functional ICT (engineering - design)
In for change not always nowing where is will go, following a flow
- Business Analysts - data scientists
Initiating change by just trying and investigating, the wind will define a destiniation. With all uncertaintities well prapared for a journey.
Putting in some nice figures into those three quadrants.
The quadrant III nobody wants to be at, a feeling of wild environment.
Maybe the quadrant III is having the big hidden opportunities to be found, in that case anohter more warm feeling is appropiate.
The picture I will use is showing a friendly happy daily trip. What is not there is an easy way to go ashore.
What more is to say ......:
Is used at:
👓
threats for data & tools Proces Life Cycle.
Details to be found at:
..
Communication: request - delivery 🚧 Expectations
Note the counterclockwise rmovements by the animation for changing technical impediments. (data tools)
There are a limited number of ways to get the requests correctly done.
- Request data, counterclokcwise, start =DS Analytics=
- Request tools, counterclokcwise, start =DS Analytics=
- Declare not useful anymore =DS Analytics=
Communication: request - delivery 🚧 Disruptions
Note the counterclockwise rmovements by the animation for changing technical impediments. (data tools)
- Request counterclokcwise, start =DS Analytics= ,
not getting delivery caused by hierarchical decision.
- Request counterclokcwise by hierarchy,
result into disposable tools, disposable data.
- Having nice data, nice tools being declare EOL by =ICT tools=, =DW support=
There much more ways to do it incorrect as to do it correct.
Evaluating, What others post
When this "quadrant of interest conflict" is understandable, the following ones also are making sense:
Xomnia Imrich
I to IV, Data delivery by =DW support= falls into "business as usual".
data quadrants
I to IV, Data delivery by =DW support= falls into "business as usual".
The unsolved question is how to achieve innovation, counterclockwise pull, when the other force is clockwise push.
The magic that an innovative stable proces would be created out of nothing, makes no sense.
A holostic strategy view: Proces Life Cycle.
🔰 the most logical
begin anchor.